Monday, February 27, 2023

On Our "Virtual Route 66" As Feburary 2023 Draws to A Close...

 We present a final edition of our "Virtual Route 66" for the Month as we look forward to the continued privilege to serve: 

https://img.industryweek.com/files/base/ebm/industryweek/image/2023/02/Book_stack_dreamstime_l_5931608.63f8e58941c52.png?auto=format%2Ccompress&w=320
Also, what are the implications of a proposed ban on noncompete clauses?
Top Stories
https://img.industryweek.com/files/base/ebm/industryweek/image/2023/02/china_US.63f83ab4e5334.png?auto=format%2Ccompress&w=320
Congress should act to restrict any products that could aid the Chinese military.
https://img.industryweek.com/files/base/ebm/industryweek/image/2023/02/Lordstown_Motors_Corp_1600.63f7dce5ea03f.png?auto=format%2Ccompress&w=320
Performance and quality issues are behind the temporary stoppage, the company says.
Advertisement

Companies must now launch new products into increasingly tight windows. This webinar will highlight how leading U.S. companies are developing innovative, profitable products faster than their competition — boosting top and bottom lines.

https://img.industryweek.com/files/base/ebm/industryweek/image/2023/02/dreamstime_xxl_201388160.63f506d5bd665.png?auto=format%2Ccompress&w=320
A look into the billions of dollars being invested in new battery plants and expansions in recent years.
Elon Musk’s Twitter Lays Off Top Lieutenant in Charge of Twitter Blue
By Erin Woo and Kevin McLaughlin

As Elon Musk has driven cost cuts even deeper into Twitter, he’s shown even the most loyal lieutenants aren’t immune from the scalpel.

Among those laid off in one of the biggest rounds of job cuts since Musk’s late October takeover was Esther Crawford, a product director at Twitter who rose to prominence early in Musk’s tenure and who had been in charge of Twitter’s relaunched subscription product. Twitter also laid off at least dozens of engineers, product managers, data scientists and managers over the weekend, according to people with direct knowledge.

The cuts suggest that Musk has failed to reverse a steep slide in revenue—down 40% year-over-year as of early January—that is styming his goal of making Twitter break even, particularly given the approximately $1.2 billion in annual interest payments the company owes related to Musk’s $44 billion leveraged buyout.

   READ THE FULL STORY    



The Briefing

 By Martin Peers
SUPPORTED BY AT-BAY

February 21, 2023

Greetings!

When it comes to profit goals, Brian Armstrong isn’t exactly setting the bar high. Coinbase declared today that it was abandoning the goal it laid out two years ago when it went public to operate “at break even, smoothed out over time,” so that losses sustained during crypto winters would be offset by profits made in good times. Instead, Coinbase said in a shareholder letter accompanying fourth-quarter earnings today that it was “setting our sights on positioning the company to generate adjusted Ebitda in all market conditions.”

Talk about qualified ambitions. Leaving aside the “setting our sights on positioning” verbiage, which makes the time frame hazy, the reliance on “adjusted Ebitda” as the metric makes this promise meaningless. Adjusted Ebitda is one of those metrics companies use when they want to pretend to be profitable by excluding all manner of inconvenient expenses. (See our deep dive here.) In the case of Coinbase, it shrank $557 million of net losses in the fourth quarter to $124 million of losses on an “adjusted Ebitda” basis by excluding a laundry list of expenses. These include stock-based compensation (that’s a biggie) and impairments on investments, as well as a $50 million penalty paid to New York regulators over “shortcomings” in its compliance program.

That issue aside, the change in profit goals is a big shift from how Coinbase sold itself to investors when it initially went public back in 2021. Armstrong’s original statement, made in a founder’s letter contained in Coinbase’s paperwork filed with the SEC, said investors “can expect volatility in our financials, given the price cycles of the cryptocurrency industry.” But he said that Coinbase took a “long-term perspective on crypto adoption” and therefore wasn’t worried about such volatility. This was part of Armstrong’s claim that the company took a “long-term view” and was “looking for long-term investors who believe in our mission and will hold through price cycles.”

So what does the change of stance mean? Armstrong may have realized that he didn’t get those long-term investors, given Coinbase’s 70%-plus stock price drop over the past year or so. He may realize that no matter what he said during the crypto boom, investors only care about profits now. So Coinbase needs to rethink everything. Fair enough. We have no idea when the crypto winter will end. Even Coinbase cautioned investors not to extrapolate forward from the upturn in crypto markets so far this year. “Industry dynamics…remain in flux,” the company said. Armstrong has to operate in that uncertain environment. If only he could aim to make real money and not fake “adjusted Ebitda” profits.

On Sale: Cybersecurity

Okta, CrowdStrike, and AvePoint. Those are three stocks—all cybersecurity companies—that look relatively cheap today compared to their peers, we wrote today in our True Value column. And after firewall provider Palo Alto Networks reported upbeat earnings late Tuesday afternoon, you could argue it also deserves a spot on that list. 

Even before the earnings report, Palo Alto Networks looked like a bargain. It ended regular trading today with its price at 7.1 times its next 12 months’ revenue, a discount to rival Fortinet, which closed the day trading at 8.5 times, according to Koyfin. Palo Alto Networks stock jumped more than 7% after hours, after the company raised its earnings per share guidance for the current fiscal year, which ends in July. The valuation gap between Palo Alto Networks’ and Fortinet’s stock will narrow slightly if that 7% stock jump is maintained on Wednesday, but Palo Alto Networks’ stock will still likely be cheaper.

And yet its free cash flow margin is higher than Fortinet's and its growth profile is also slightly higher. Palo Alto Networks’ free cash flow margins for the last 12 months were roughly 44%, while Fortinet’s were just 33%. Plus, Palo Alto Networks estimated in its earnings release today that revenue will likely grow at least 25% in its current fiscal year, while analysts expect Fortinet will grow just 22% in 2023, according to S&P Global Market Intelligence.—Akash Pasricha


In Other News

  • The Federal Trade Commission won’t challenge Amazon’s acquisition of One Medical, according to Bloomberg
  • Max Cutler, who led Spotify’s audio talk shows and partnerships and oversaw deals the company made with podcasting giants like Joe Rogan, is leaving the company, according to Bloomberg
  • Walmart said sales growth would slow this year and shoppers are becoming more cautious with their spending on nonessential products. 
  • Polygon Labs, a group of crypto companies building the Polygon blockchain network, which has one of the 10 largest cryptocurrencies by market cap, laid off 20% of its employees, or roughly 100 people. 

New From Our Reporters

Opinion: Internet Freedom Isn’t a Luxury

Three Cybersecurity Stocks That Look Cheap

Before Rebirth, Microsoft’s Bing Faced Near-Death Experiences

Weekend: ‘We All Have One Big Dream’: How Ukraine’s Tech Companies Evolved to Survive a Year of War

Weekend: My Week of Being Gaslit and Lied to by the New Bing

Weekend: If Teslas Had a Kickstand: Premium Electric Motorcycles Are Finally Ready to Ride

Inside Stripe’s $55 Billion Pitch to Investors

Amazon’s Shrinking Cloud Gaming Service Could Be the Next Stadia

What We’re Reading

How Apple captured Gen Z in the US — and changed their social circles (Financial Times)

Hedge Fund Billionaire Extracts Billions More to Retire (The New York Times)

No comments: