Fidenza #313 (which sold for $3.3 million) and Fidenza #9 — from the NFT project Art Blocks [Courtesy of Tyler Hobbs]
A new week dawns. Our team pulled together some #RandomThoughts on Crypto (courtesy the team at CoinBase) and weekly developments courtesy the team at The Information, Bloomberg Green along with TED.
We look forward to the continued privilege to serve:
What’s up? It’s Coinbase Bytes,
There’s never a dull moment on the blockchain. Here’s what you need to know this week:
- DeFi’s record summer. Big firms eye decentralized finance, lifting some apps to new heights.
- The next NFT trend. Art Blocks’ massive growth and the rise of “generative” NFTs.
- Cuba recognizes crypto. The country outlines new rules for using digital assets.
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
Price changes are for the past week, ending on Sep 1, 2021 at 01:58 PM UTC
DEFI UPDATE |
Decentralized finance apps hit all-time highs
NFTs aren’t the only element of the Ethereum economy that are booming this summer. The universe of crypto-based lending, saving, and trading apps known as DeFi has also been breaking records. This week, the total value locked (TVL) — the total amount of money traders have put to work via various DeFi platforms — broke previous all-time highs set in May, reaching $165 billion. So what’s been fueling DeFi’s latest surge?
- Institutional investors attracted by high yields are increasingly interested in DeFi — including payment company Square and Wall Street giants like J.P. Morgan and BlackRock. According to the Chainalysis Global DeFi Adoption Index, the share of DeFi transaction volume conducted by large institutional traders rose from less than 10% in mid-2020 to over 60% in the second quarter of this year.
- MetaMask, a popular wallet option for DeFi, has seen its user count soar 1,800% this year. It now has more than 10 million users, up from around 600,000 last summer (and 5 million in April).
- A consortium of the largest DeFi apps have banded together to bring DeFi to “the 6 billon smartphone users around the world.” Using a crypto platform called Celo, the group (which includes Aave, Curve, and Sushiswap) aims to increase crypto adoption in developing economies.
- Decentralized lending platform Aave is the largest DeFi application, with $14.2 billion TVL. Aave is set to launch a dedicated lending platform for institutions “within weeks.” In other Aave news, Bitwise, the world’s largest crypto-index-fund manager (with over $1 billion invested) recently announced the creation of the Bitwise Aave Fund.
Why it matters… Even if you aren’t directly experimenting with DeFi, it’s good to know what’s happening in that world if you trade popular tokens associated with DeFi — like ETH, Solana, and Cardano. (Cardano’s smart-contract functionality rolls out soon.) ETH now regularly sees greater trade volumes than BTC — and by market cap Cardano is now the third-biggest cryptocurrency while Solana is eighth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How Silicon Valley Wined and Dined Elizabeth Holmes
Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes is back in the news in Silicon Valley. The jury in her forthcoming trial, in which she stands accused of defrauding investors and the public about the company’s blood tests, was selected this week. The trial starts next week and will last a few months.
I was thinking about Holmes this week as I was processing the slew of reports and social media commentary. And there’s one thing about the reaction to her story that’s never sat well with me.
Since The Wall Street Journal exposed her fraud, Silicon Valley investors, entrepreneurs and tech’s influential chattering types have been quick to distance themselves from Holmes. The attitude they shared again and again was essentially “She really wasn’t one of us.”
The bulk of Theranos’ funding didn’t come from traditional venture capitalists, these people like to remind us. Her board included senators and cabinet secretaries, not tech luminaries. To put an even finer point on it, well-known tech investors took the rare step of publicly bragging that they passed on investing in the company when they had the chance. While soaking in the drama of her downfall, Silicon Valley elites wanted everyone to know they had nothing to do with what happened.
But they did. Tech investors, like Oracle founder Larry Ellison, were among Theranos’s biggest backers. So was Tim Draper via his firm, DFJ.
And as a student at Stanford University, Holmes was mentored by the same cast of characters who claim credit for helping Larry Page and Sergey Brin start Google, among other things. The tech press fawned over her.
One event around 2013 or 2014 comes to mind. I was at a party at the lavish home of one of tech’s most powerful investors. Holmes was there, and her presence was instantly apparent because half the crowd mingling on the tennis-court-turned-cocktail-
As the crowd began to move to a different area of the party, a female tech executive came up to me and bragged that she had recently had coffee with Holmes and that she was “the real deal.” I was somewhat bummed that I had missed the chance to introduce myself to such an icon, but I figured there would be other chances.
No, Silicon Valley didn’t hate Holmes or know from the beginning that she was a bad egg. Silicon Valley tried to cozy up to her, as it does so many other powerful people. It just turned out that when it all went south, those people conveniently forgot about all the times they had wined and dined her. If the story had turned out differently, I promise you, each of those individuals would be claiming a piece of her success.
None of this is to say that Silicon Valley is to blame for Holmes’ actions. I don’t believe that. I believe she was a uniquely troubled and dangerous person. And she’ll probably have to pay for her mistakes.
But the smugness with which many powerful people in Silicon Valley are treating Theranos now is highly problematic. In dodging responsibility, they are saying they don’t need to learn from what happened.
But Silicon Valley must learn from Theranos, because many of the problems at the center of its downfall—lax diligence, governance dominated by clubby relationships, the aggrandizement of founders—persist. In fact, there’s a lot of evidence they are getting worse.
Last week, the co-founder of meditation app Headspace was charged with defrauding investors. And Kate wrote recently about how the race to invest in hot companies is leading investors to cut corners on due diligence.
I hope Silicon Valley stops stuffing Theranos down the memory hole and starts thinking about how to spot the next Holmes before it’s too late.
With Labor Day upon us, summer is effectively over. And with news today thin on the ground, this seems an appropriate moment to review the highs and lows of the summer in tech business. So without further ado, here are The Briefing’s awards for the most distinctive tech business stories of the past three months:
Worst Boys-and-Their-Toys Moment: This is a tie between Richard Branson and Jeff Bezos for their rocket ship rides, days apart in July. The competition between the two was so intense that Branson’s ship was reportedly in danger during its flight but the pilots didn’t abort, possibly to avoiddispleasing the boss. As for Bezos, his comments afterwards thanking Amazon customers “because you paid for all this” came across as just a touch clueless.
Worst Planned IPO: Didi Global. No contest here. What Chinese company goes public after warnings by the Chinese government not to go ahead? Didi stock almost immediately lost nearly half its value.
Low Points in Antitrust Regulation: There’s a lot to choose from here. The FTC’s review of Amazon’s proposed MGM acquisition was a contender for the title, given how the deal would advance the Biden administration’s aims of giving consumers more choice in television and is probably the least compelling example of Amazon extending its power. In the end, however, how could we pass up a court tossing out the FTC and states’ lawsuits against Facebook, declaring the initial complaint had not made the case? Great stuff.
Biggest Deal That Wasn’t: DoorDash buying Instacart. This would have been a $50 billion acquisition that would have transformed the intensely competitive food delivery market. News that the talks occurred came after months of Instacart systematically replacing most of its top management team, including its CEO, which made it even more intriguing.
Most Improved Stock Performance: Asana, whose stock has tripled since late May, after treading water for most of the previous eight months. It’s not clear what Asana’s co-founder Dustin Moskovitz is injecting into the waters around Wall Street, but it’s certainly working. The stock rally has lifted the value of Moskovitz’s stake to about $5 billion, a second fortune on top of the billions he made as a co-founder of Facebook.
Best Example of PR Doubletalk: There’s always intense competition in this category but it’s hard to pass up Apple Fellow Phil Schiller’s statements that Apple has “great respect” for the Japan Fair Trade commission and appreciates “the work we’ve done together.” The Japanese regulator this week forced Apple to relax its App Store rules in favor of some developers. It’s a great example of a company executive saying in public the opposite of what we’re sure they mean.
It seems only to be a matter of time before Apple and Google have to give up the tight controls they exercise over their mobile app stores, given the onslaught of litigation, investigation and legislation they each face around the world. And that means investors need to start thinking about the bottom line impact of the potential changes.
We got some assistance in that analysis with a new version of the states’ antitrust action against Google over its app store, Google Play, filed on Saturday, with some of the prior redactions lifted. It stated that Google Play generated $11.2 billion in revenue in 2019 and booked $7 billion in operating income. (Credit to Reuters’ Paresh Dave for working on a Saturday to report this.)That means the Play Store accounted for 20% of what Alphabet reported in operating income that year, a startlingly high number.
Notably, such a proportion is in line with estimates of what Apple’s App Store contributes to the iPhone maker’s gargantuan profits. To be sure, the Apple number is far from confirmed. But the Google estimate comes from a group of states that conducted a nearly two year-long investigation into the company, so it seems likely to be reliable. It is telling that Google, and possibly Apple, get a fifth of their profits from parts of their businesses which the company’s don’t break out separately. The likely reason is that they know the sheer size of the profits are hard to defend.
After all, much, if not most, of that money comes from the 30% commission on in-app purchases, justification for which has been hard to find. As the states’ lawsuit against Google noted, when one employee asked where the 30% figure came from, another responded “pretty sure Steve Jobs just made it up for itunes” [sic]. Apple’s concessions last week on its app store rules, in response to a developer class action lawsuit, are likely just the beginning of the end for this particular river of tech gold.
ZOOM VIDEO’S FLIGHT PATH FLATTENS
There’s no pleasing some people, particularly investors in Zoom Video. Yes the video conferencing company is no longer reporting rocket-ship-like revenue growth. But its July quarter revenues were still solid—revenues up 54%! And yet Zoom shares fell 12% in after-hours trading.
That reaction makes about as much sense as most meme stock purchases! Did anyone think Zoom could continue increasing revenue 350 to 370%, as it did for a couple of quarters last year? It’s good enough that Zoom built on last year’s growth to expand further. Moreover, Zoom generated $455 million in real cash, increasing its total cash pile to $5 billion.
What investors are likely reacting to is Zoom’s even more downbeat growth projections for next quarter. Fourth quarter revenue growth will be around 31%, Zoom indicated. For the full year, revenue will be up 51%, it expects. All in all, given the competition Zoom now faces from giants like Google, those aren’t bad numbers.
AXEL SPRINGER’S SPENDING SPREE
Question: Is German media giant Axel Springer the new Verizon of digital media?
Verizon famously spent $8.3 billion between 2015 and 2017 buying, first, AOL and then Yahoo in an attempt to get into the digital-media-advertising market. Shortly after completing the Yahoo deal, a change in management prompted a change in strategy. Earlier this year Verizon dumped both properties for just $5 billion, an outcome that only looks good when compared to cellular rival AT&T’s even more disastrous foray into media.
It’s hard not to think of that experience after Axel Springer’s billion dollar purchase of Politico last week—a rich multiple of five times revenue—which follows its $500 million acquisition of Business Insider in 2015. Insider, as it is known, has since gone on its own spending spree, buying control of newsletter publisher Morning Brew at a $75 million valuation.
Of course, the parallel with Verizon isn’t exact. Axel Springer is an old hand in media, unlike the phone company. Verizon’s AOL and Yahoo were both heavily weighted towards digital advertising, a brutally competitive market, whereas Politico and Insider are both at least partly subscription businesses. Even so, it’s hard to see how Axel Springer will get a return on these investments—particularly given the over-the-top price it paid for Politico—that will be good enough for its main backer, KKR.
It’s likely not a coincidence that U.S. media firms like the New York Times Co. and News Corp., which presumably know the market better than Axel Springer, aren’t spending money like their German rival. If history is any guide—and, let’s face it, it usually is—Axel Springer will struggle to get a decent return. It’s probably just a matter of time before the company follows the lead of Verizon and reverses course. The next couple of years in digital media are shaping up to be bloodier than the past few.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment